Opinion
Argued January 23, 1895
Decided February 8, 1895
Charles Steele for appellant.
Charles Steckler for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Rettig v. Fifth Avenue Transportation Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 8, 1895
39 N.E. 859 (N.Y. 1895)
Summaries of
Rettig v. Fifth Avenue Transportation Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 8, 1895
39 N.E. 859 (N.Y. 1895)
Case details for
Rettig v. Fifth Avenue Transportation Company
Case Details
Full title:LIZZI RETTIG, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v . FIFTH AVENUE…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 8, 1895
Citations
39 N.E. 859 (N.Y. 1895)
39 N.E. 859
70 N.Y. St. Rptr. 868
Citing Cases
Mullane v. Houston, West Street & Pavonia Ferry Railroad
And so the foreman was representing the master in and about that kind of work, the superintendence and…
Cunningham v. Sicilian Asphalt Paving Co.There is nothing in the point as to contributory negligence. The plaintiff had a right to assume that the…