applying New Mexico law and noting that an officer may not be held liable in connection with the use of "reasonable force" to effect an arrest
Summary of this case from Youbyoung Park v. GaitanNo. 94-1195.
August 16, 1995.
Appeal from the D.Colo.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.
applying New Mexico law and noting that an officer may not be held liable in connection with the use of "reasonable force" to effect an arrest
Summary of this case from Youbyoung Park v. Gaitanconstruing substantially identical Air Force Reg. 125-18 ¶ 11-23e
Summary of this case from Strachan v. Army Clemency and Parole BoardIn United States v. Henson, 64 F.3d 670, 1995 WL 503972, at *1 (10th Cir. August 25, 1995), the Tenth Circuit affirmed a fine of $1500 on the basis that the district court "expressly referred to the inmate financial responsibility program as a source of funds, plus employment during supervised release."
Summary of this case from Phillips v. BookerFull title:Resolution Trust Corp. v. Noel
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Aug 16, 1995
Although the ALJ did mention this consideration, any error in this regard was undoubtedly harmless, as his…
Youbyoung Park v. GaitanThe district court, relying on an unpublished decision from our court, noted that a law enforcement officer…