From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Apr 12, 1994
20 F.3d 397 (11th Cir. 1994)

Opinion

No. 91-3924.

April 12, 1994.

Broad and Cassel, Brenda Lee London, Robert D. Gatton, Orlando, FL, for appellants.

Giles, Hedrick Robinson, P.A., Orlando, FL, E. Givens Goodspeed, Kirk K. Van Tine, Baker Botts, Washington, DC, for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Nos. 89-205-Civ-Orl-19, 89-207-Civ-Orl-19, 89-208-Civ-Orl-19), Patricia C. Fawsett, Judge.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion November 23, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993, 7 F.3d 1006)


A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Apr 12, 1994
20 F.3d 397 (11th Cir. 1994)
Case details for

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., PLAINTIFF, v. DUNMAR CORP. AND MICHAEL D. JONES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Apr 12, 1994

Citations

20 F.3d 397 (11th Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.

RTC's petition for en banc rehearing was granted, thus vacating the panel opinion. 20 F.3d 397 (11th Cir.…

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Govaert

However, rehearing en banc has been granted in Jones, and the panel opinion was vacated. Resolution Trust…