From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Republic-Vanguard Ins. Co. v. Cent. State Holdings, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
May 25, 2017
Case No. 4:16-CV-1616 (CEJ) (E.D. Mo. May. 25, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 4:16-CV-1616 (CEJ)

05-25-2017

REPUBLIC-VANGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL STATE HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the motion of plaintiff Republic-Vanguard Insurance Company for default judgment against defendant Enersource Electrical Contractors, LLC, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2).

The record shows that service was achieved on Enersource on March 10, 2017. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A)(i), Enersource was required to file an answer or other responsive pleading within twenty-one days of being served with the complaint. Because Enersource failed to do so, the Court entered an order on April 17, 2017, directing the plaintiff to file a motion for entry of default. [Doc. #34]. The Clerk of Court entered default on April 28, 2017. [Doc. #37]. In the instant motion, plaintiff seeks default judgment in the form of a declaration that plaintiff has no duty to defend or indemnify Enersource under a commercial liability insurance policy. Defendant Enersource has not responded to the motion.

District courts have discretion in deciding motions for default judgment. See Weitz Co. LLC v. MacKenzie House, LLC, 665 F.3d 970, 978 (8th Cir. 2012). Here, default judgment against Enersource may affect the claims of other parties. Thus, for the purposes of this action, the better course is to defer judgment against the defaulting party until the merits have been resolved. See Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Henry, No. 2:06-CV-31, 2006 WL 3544381, at *2 (D. N.D. Nov. 21, 2006) (citing Angelo Iafrate Constr., LLC v. Potashnick Constr., Inc., 370 F.3d 715, 722 (8th Cir. 2004)). Therefore, in order to avoid inconsistent results, the plaintiff's motion will be denied without prejudice. See id.; Atl. Cas. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Young, No. 4:15-CV-00069 (AGF), 2015 WL 12850548 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 11, 2015); United Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 1:09-CV-00051 (LMB), 2010 WL 561578, at *2 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 10, 2010).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of plaintiff Republic-Vanguard Insurance Company for default judgment against defendant Enersource Electrical Contractors, LLC [Doc. #35] is denied without prejudice.

/s/_________

CAROL E. JACKSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 25th day of May, 2017.


Summaries of

Republic-Vanguard Ins. Co. v. Cent. State Holdings, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
May 25, 2017
Case No. 4:16-CV-1616 (CEJ) (E.D. Mo. May. 25, 2017)
Case details for

Republic-Vanguard Ins. Co. v. Cent. State Holdings, LLC

Case Details

Full title:REPUBLIC-VANGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL STATE HOLDINGS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 25, 2017

Citations

Case No. 4:16-CV-1616 (CEJ) (E.D. Mo. May. 25, 2017)