From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Renfroe v. Renfroe

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 6, 1976
326 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-485.

February 6, 1976.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stewart F. LaMotte, Jr., Judge.

David M. Bernstein, and Norman F. Solomon, Law Offices of Norman F. Solomon, Miami, for appellant.

Dan A. Hames, Law Offices of Dan A. Hames, Coral Gables, for appellee-Kenneth Renfroe.


In the final judgment dissolving the marriage of the parties to this appeal, appellee-husband was directed to make support payments of $33.00 to the wife for each of the two children and alimony payments of $33.00 to the wife, but through clerical error or oversight the judgment did not specify how such payments were to be made. On oral argument before the court, counsel for the respective parties stipulated that such payments were to be made weekly. Accordingly the final judgment is modified to this effect. Appellant's other points are without merit and the judgment, as herein modified, is affirmed.

Affirmed, as modified.

DOWNEY, J., and DRIVER, B.J., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Renfroe v. Renfroe

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 6, 1976
326 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Renfroe v. Renfroe

Case Details

Full title:MARILYN RENFROE, APPELLANT, v. KENNETH RENFROE AND CHARTER BANK OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 6, 1976

Citations

326 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Ringelman v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp.

Case law supports the proposition that counsel's representations during oral argument are binding. See…

Hodge v. Hodge

Former Husband's counsel conceded at oral argument that there was a mathematical error in his initial brief…