From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rencsok v. Rencsok

Michigan Court of Appeals
Mar 27, 1969
168 N.W.2d 439 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

Docket No. 5,334.

Decided March 27, 1969.

Appeal from Wayne, John B. Swainson, J. Submitted Division 1 March 3, 1969, at Detroit. (Docket No. 5,334.) Decided March 27, 1969.

Complaint by Mary Ellen Rencsok against Joel A. Rencsok and seventeen others for fraud. Default judgment against defendant. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Eliot Charlip, for plaintiff.

Carolyn Florescu (Neighborhood Legal Service Center), for defendant on appeal.

BEFORE: LESINSKI, C.J., and FITZGERALD and V.J. BRENNAN, JJ.


Plaintiff, in a suit against her husband and 17 others, claimed she had been defrauded of her interest in assets jointly owned by plaintiff and defendant husband. A default judgment was entered against defendant husband who appeals.

The default was properly entered and will not be set aside. Defendant failed to show good cause and neglected to file an affidavit of facts showing a meritorious defense as required by GCR 1963, 520.4. See also White v. Sadler (1957), 350 Mich. 511.

Other matters raised have been considered and are deemed without merit.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.


Summaries of

Rencsok v. Rencsok

Michigan Court of Appeals
Mar 27, 1969
168 N.W.2d 439 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

Rencsok v. Rencsok

Case Details

Full title:RENCSOK v. RENCSOK

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 27, 1969

Citations

168 N.W.2d 439 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
168 N.W.2d 439

Citing Cases

Sheneman v. Sheneman

Paynton v. Paynton (1916), 194 Mich. 504, 508. See, generally, 24 Am Jur 2d, Divorce and Separation, § 439, p…

Rencsok v. Rencsok

After a trial was held on the merits, the court sitting without a jury found that plaintiff's signature on…