From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reilly v. James A. Dever School

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 18, 2003
307 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2003-00509

Submitted June 13, 2003.

August 18, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Valley Stream Union Free School District Thirteen, s/h/a Valley Stream Union Free School District #13, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), dated December 13, 2002, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ahmuty, Demers McManus, Albertson, N.Y. (Brendan T. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for appellant.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA L. TOWNES, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when she tripped over a water sprinkler head in the grass on the lawn at the Wheeler Avenue School in Valley Stream. The Supreme Court improperly denied summary judgment to the defendant Valley Stream Union Free School District Thirteen, s/h/a Valley Stream Union Free School District # 13 (hereinafter the defendant). The plaintiff's testimony, the photographs which she identified as accurately depicting the sprinkler head over which she tripped, and the place and circumstances of the alleged injury, established that the sprinkler head "did not constitute a trap or nuisance and was too trivial to be actionable as a matter of law" (Rametta v. County of Nassau, 296 A.D.2d 485, 486; see Trincere v. County of Suffolk, 90 N.Y.2d 976; Hymanson v. A.L.L. Assoc., 300 A.D.2d 358, 359; Dynov v. 16th Ave. Realty Assoc., 292 A.D.2d 335; Neumann v. Senior Citizens Ctr., 273 A.D.2d 452). In opposition to the defendant's prima facie case for summary judgment, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the defendant was entitled to summary judgment (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320).

SANTUCCI, J.P., McGINITY, TOWNES and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reilly v. James A. Dever School

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 18, 2003
307 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Reilly v. James A. Dever School

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTIE REILLY, respondent, v. JAMES A. DEVER SCHOOL, defendant, VALLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 18, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
763 N.Y.S.2d 488

Citing Cases

Kosarin v. W S Assocs

Photographs authenticated by the plaintiff at her deposition depict a visible but shallow depression in an…

Aquino v. City of New York

The court in Pennella v. 277 Bronx River Road Owners, Inc., 309 AD2d 793 (2nd Dept., 2003), ruled that where…