From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reid v. Schoenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 2001
288 A.D.2d 203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted September 26, 2001.

November 5, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered December 5, 2000, which granted the plaintiff's motion to strike their answer.

Steven R. Harris (Morici Morici, LLP, Garden City, N Y (Constantine Giannakos] of counsel), for appellants.

Siben Siben, LLP, Bay Shore, N.Y. (Alan G. Faber of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly struck the defendants' answer to the complaint. The remedy of striking a pleading pursuant to CPLR 3126 for failure to comply with court-ordered disclosure should be granted only where the conduct of the resisting party is shown to be willful, contumacious, or in bad faith. The willful and contumacious character of the defendants' conduct can be inferred from their repeated noncompliance with court orders directing depositions, coupled with inadequate excuses (see, Bodine v. Ladjevardi, 284 A.D.2d 351; Kingsley v. Kantor, 265 A.D.2d 529; Castrignano v. Flynn, 255 A.D.2d 352; Garcia v. Kraniotakis, 232 A.D.2d 369).

The defendants' remaining contentions are either not properly before this court or without merit.

O'BRIEN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY, SCHMIDT and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reid v. Schoenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 2001
288 A.D.2d 203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Reid v. Schoenthal

Case Details

Full title:ERICA Y. REID, RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT SCHOENTHAL, ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 5, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 580

Citing Cases

Vaccaro v. Weinstein

The extreme sanction of striking Weinstein's answer was not warranted by the conduct herein, which does not…

CDJ Corp. v. Commodore Manufacturing Corp.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs. The plaintiffs…