From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reid v. Crucet

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 22, 1993
615 So. 2d 858 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-211.

March 22, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Leon County, N. Sanders Sauls, J.

Lorence Jon Bielby of Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen Quentel, P.A., and Robert C. Reid, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Sheldon Zipkin of Roth, Zipkin, Cove Roth, North Miami Beach, Walter Dartland, Joseph Boyd, Jr. of Boyd Branch, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellees.


The Reids, buyers of a residential home, brought this action against the sellers for damages which resulted when the sellers misrepresented or failed to disclose unobservable material defects in the property, about which they knew, and the buyers relied to their detriment upon these representations. The jury's verdict awarding the buyers $30,000 damages is supported by the facts and the law. Johnson v. Davis, 480 So.2d 625 (Fla. 1985). However, the trial court erred in failing to award the Reids their attorney's fees and in awarding prejudgment interest from the date of the jury verdict rather than the date of closing. Burkett v. Rice, 542 So.2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); and Thomas v. Toth, 539 So.2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, SMITH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reid v. Crucet

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 22, 1993
615 So. 2d 858 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Reid v. Crucet

Case Details

Full title:MARIAN M. AND ROBERT C. REID, APPELLANTS, v. DOGULAS S. CRUCET AND MICHAEL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 22, 1993

Citations

615 So. 2d 858 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Ariz. Chem. Co. v. Mohawk Indus., Inc.

It should be emphasized that Mohawk did not sue to recover the difference in value between the resin it…