From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rehearing Denied

U.S.
Nov 27, 2000
531 U.S. 1030 (2000)

Opinion

NOVEMBER 27, 2000


99-1935 COLUMBUS-AMERICA DISCOVERY GROUP, INC. v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. ET AL., ante, p. 918;

99-1980 NEXTWAVE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, ante, p. 924;

99-2054 SAAVEDRA, AS SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF HJALMARSSON, DECEASED, ET AL. v. KOREAN AIR LINES CO., LTD., ante, p. 826;

99-8992 LITTLES v. UNITED STATES, ante, p. 829;

99-9337 MATTATALL v. VOSE, DIRECTOR, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 530 U.S. 1221;

99-9445 SMALLWOOD v. GIBSON, WARDEN, ET AL., ante, p. 833;

99-9446 HEIM v. NEBRASKA, ET AL., ante, p. 833;

99-9468 SHABAZZ FKA HURLEY v. NEW YORK, 530 U.S. 1280;

99-9476 SPERO v. UNITED STATES, ante, p. 833;

99-9526 BATES v. FLORIDA, ante, p. 835;

99-9543 MMAHAT v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, ante, p. 836;

99-9562 JOHNSON v. BRAXTON, WARDEN, ante, p. 836;

99-9612 WILSON v. GEORGIA, ante, p. 838;

99-9644 PACE v. GEORGIA, ante, p. 839;

99-9668 IN RE CAGLE, ante, p. 810;

99-9914 JAMES v. CITY OF ROCK HILL ET AL., ante, p. 850;

99-9946 BUCKOM v. O'KONEK, ante, p. 852;

99-9975 KINERMON v. GARCIA, WARDEN, ante, p. 853;

99-9979 WILLIAMS v. EPPS, ante, p. 854;

99-10002 CHANDLER v. DeKALB COUNTY BOARD COMMUNITY SERVICES, ante, p. 855;

99-10004 MINOR v. WETHERINGTON ET AL., ante, p. 855;

99-10026 MOORE v. PHELPS DODGE WIRE MAGNET CO., ante, p. 856;

99-10065 WILLIAMSON v. DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, ante, p. 858;

99-10067 SMITH v. CHAPMAN, WARDEN, ante, p. 858;

99-10113 TOMPKINS v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ante, p. 861;

99-10140 FUSTER-ESCALONA v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL., ante, p. 863;

99-10146 GLAVIS v. GARCIA, WARDEN, ET AL., ante, p. 863;


Summaries of

Rehearing Denied

U.S.
Nov 27, 2000
531 U.S. 1030 (2000)
Case details for

Rehearing Denied

Case Details

Full title:REHEARING DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 27, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 1030 (2000)

Citing Cases

In re Pacific Gas and Elec. Co.

The Second Circuit reasoned that Congress "was not chiefly interested in maximizing license-holders'…

In re Pacific Gas and Elec. Co.

The Second Circuit reasoned that Congress "was not chiefly interested in maximizing license-holders'…