From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Regalado v. Regalado

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 22, 1999
743 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-02133.

Opinion filed October 22, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Katherine G. Essrig, Judge.

Jose Regalado, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.


The appellant, Jose Regalado, challenges the final judgment of dissolution of marriage entered in this case. He argues that the trial court erred when it set the final hearing without allowing a reasonable time from the service of the notice of hearing. Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.440(a) mandates that "[t]rial shall be set within a reasonable time from the service of the notice for trial." Here, the notice was served less than ten days prior to the final hearing, and Mr. Regalado, who was incarcerated at the time, did not appear at the hearing. Under the circumstances, we do not consider this to be a reasonable time. Even though the final judgment appears to be favorable to Mr. Regalado, we are compelled to set aside that judgment and remand with instructions to the trial court to conduct a new hearing. See Broussard v. Broussard, 506 So.2d 463 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, A.C.J., and DAVIS, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Regalado v. Regalado

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 22, 1999
743 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Regalado v. Regalado

Case Details

Full title:JOSE REGALADO, Appellant, v. DEBORAH REGALADO, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 22, 1999

Citations

743 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Gerard v. Gerard

Nevertheless, in this contested divorce, the wife had only seven days from the court's oral pronouncement on…

Department of Revenue v. Marcovitch

Department of Revenue v. Freeman, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D1685 (Fla. 5th DCA July 14, 2000) (In post-dissolution…