From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reese v. Verizon California, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit
May 8, 2012
2012-1048 (Fed. Cir. May. 8, 2012)

Opinion

2012-1048

05-08-2012

MORRIS REESE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND AT&T CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in case no. 11-CV-1934, Judge S. James Otero.

ON MOTION


ORDER

Morris Reese moves for a 60-day extension of time, until June 29, 2012, to his reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

_________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Rachel C. Hughey, Esq,

Michael J. Songer, Esq.

James Wallace, Jr., Esq

s21


Summaries of

Reese v. Verizon California, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit
May 8, 2012
2012-1048 (Fed. Cir. May. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Reese v. Verizon California, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS REESE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit

Date published: May 8, 2012

Citations

2012-1048 (Fed. Cir. May. 8, 2012)