Summary
In Reese v. Rutherford, supra, it is said, in effect, that the right to recover as damages interest at the rate in force at the time of the default down to the time when the legal rate is changed is in the nature of a vested right, of which the plaintiff cannot be deprived by retroactive legislation...
Summary of this case from Gregory v. State of CaliforniaOpinion
Argued October 11, 1882
Decided October 24, 1882
George H. Forster for appellant.
Hugh L. Cole for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for affirmance, with costs.
All concur, except RAPALLO, J., absent.
Judgment affirmed.