From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 1, 2005
175 S.W.3d 196 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. ED 85698.

November 1, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County; Jon A. Cunningham, Judge.

Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.


ORDER


Tommy E. Reed ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Reed v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 1, 2005
175 S.W.3d 196 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Reed v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tommy E. REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Nov 1, 2005

Citations

175 S.W.3d 196 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Reed v. Moore

Exh. A). The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Petitioner's post-conviction motion. Reed v.…