From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. State

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
Apr 3, 2018
No. 06-17-00104-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 3, 2018)

Opinion

No. 06-17-00104-CR

04-03-2018

TORRY JAMAL REED, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 124th District Court Gregg County, Texas
Trial Court No. 41786-B Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. ORDER

Torry Jamal Reed was convicted by a Gregg County jury of murder and was sentenced to seventy-five years' imprisonment. The trial court initially appointed counsel to represent Reed in the appeal of his murder conviction, after having determined that Reed was indigent. Thereafter, appointed counsel withdrew from representation on Reed's request, and Reed retained Gerald L. Smith, Sr., to represent him on appeal. Thereafter, Smith filed an Anders brief on Reed's behalf and filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. Ultimately, this Court granted Smith's motion to withdraw as counsel, in accordance with Rule 6.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. We then afforded Reed the opportunity to retain new counsel to represent him in this appeal. Reed filed a motion for extension of time in which to retain new counsel "due to recent fund issues within [his] family." Reed has now filed a pro se response to Smith's Anders brief.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). By letter dated February 26, 2018, we advised Smith that the provisions of Anders do not apply to retained counsel. See Lopez v. State, 283 S.W.3d 479, 480 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009, no pet.); Rivera v. State, 130 S.W.3d 454, 459 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2004, no pet.). However, recognizing that retained counsel has an ethical obligation to refuse to pursue a frivolous appeal, we have held that, "when counsel encounters such an appeal, he must inform the appellate court of it and seek leave to withdraw in compliance with Rule 6.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure." Lopez, 283 S.W.3d at 480.

Based on these circumstances, which reflect that Reed might now be indigent, we abate this matter to the trial court so that it may conduct whatever hearings are necessary to make the following determinations: (1) whether Reed still desires to prosecute his appeal and (2) whether Reed is indigent and entitled to appointment of counsel to represent him in this appeal. If Reed is determined to be indigent, then the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent Reed in this appeal.

The trial court may enter any orders necessary to implement these directives. Any hearing shall be conducted by the trial court within ten days of the date of this order. Appropriate orders and findings shall be sent to this Court in the form of a supplemental clerk's record within ten days of the date of the hearing contemplated by this order. The reporter's record of any hearing shall be filed with this Court within ten days of the date of the hearing contemplated by this order.

All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of the supplemental appellate record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT Date: April 3, 2018


Summaries of

Reed v. State

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
Apr 3, 2018
No. 06-17-00104-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Reed v. State

Case Details

Full title:TORRY JAMAL REED, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Date published: Apr 3, 2018

Citations

No. 06-17-00104-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 3, 2018)