From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Episcopal Health Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued January 11, 2000

February 24, 2000

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated November 13, 1998, which denied her motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, and (2) an order of the same court, dated November 25, 1998, which granted the separate motions of the defendants Episcopal Health Services, Inc., o/b/o St. John's Episcopal Hospital, South Shore Division, and Gail DeLasho to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Geoghan Cohen Bongiorno, New York, N.Y. (Courtney Murphy of counsel), for appellant.

Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone Monaghan, LLP, White Plains, N Y (Edward J. Guardaro, Jr., of counsel), for respondent Episcopal Health Services, Inc., o/b/o St. John's Episcopal Hospital, South Shore Division.

O'Leary O'Leary, Jamaica, N.Y. (Joseph D. Furlong of counsel), for respondent Gail DeLasho.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO and SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion to restore the action to the trial calendar inasmuch as the case was not ready for trial. The plaintiff repeatedly failed to comply with the court's directives that she serve upon the defendants the report of an examining physician pursuant to the court rules (see, Uniform Rules for Trial Cts [22 NYCRR] § 22 NYCRR 202.17[b], [f]; § 22 NYCRR 202.21[f]). Accordingly, the plaintiff was precluded from offering any evidence of her physical condition (see, Uniform Rules for Trial Cts [22 N.Y.CRR] § 22 NYCRR 202.17[h]), thus warranting dismissal of the complaint.


Summaries of

Reed v. Episcopal Health Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Reed v. Episcopal Health Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:YOLANDA REED, appellant, v. EPISCOPAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., o/b/o ST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
706 N.Y.S.2d 333

Citing Cases

Swezey v. Montague Rehab Pain Management

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in precluding the plaintiffs treating physician, her…

Bailey v. Owens

§ 202.17 requires that the plaintiff, in advance of the defendant's physical/mental examination of the…