From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redford v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Nov 1, 2022
6:21-cv-00333 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2022)

Opinion

6:21-cv-00333

11-01-2022

Patrick Redford, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

J. CAMPBELL BARKER, United States District Judge

Plaintiff filed this civil action pursuant to the Social Security Act, Section 205(g), for judicial review of the Commissioner's denial of his application for Social Security benefits. The action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a report recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. Doc. 17. No objections to the magistrate judge's report were filed.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Redford v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Nov 1, 2022
6:21-cv-00333 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Redford v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Patrick Redford, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Nov 1, 2022

Citations

6:21-cv-00333 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2022)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Substantial evidence has four categories: “(1) objective medical facts or clinical findings; (2) diagnoses of…