From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redell-Witte v. Algoma Hardwoods, Inc.

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 28, 2023
222 A.D.3d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

1307 Index No. 190011/20 Case No.2023–03839

12-28-2023

Holly REDELL-WITTE, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. ALGOMA HARDWOODS, INC., et al., Defendants, T.M. Cobb Company, Defendant–Appellant.

Clyde & Co. U.S. LLP, New York (Thomas G. Carruthers of counsel), for appellant. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., New York (Christopher Romanelli of counsel), for respondent.


Clyde & Co. U.S. LLP, New York (Thomas G. Carruthers of counsel), for appellant.

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., New York (Christopher Romanelli of counsel), for respondent.

Kern, J.P., Oing, Gesmer, Moulton, Mendez, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Adam Silvera, J.), entered on or about July 24, 2023, which denied defendant T.M. Cobb Company's motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

The court should have granted the motion to dismiss the complaint as against this defendant for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(2) because there is no evidence that the fire doors that allegedly caused decedent plaintiff's injury by exposing him to asbestos were manufactured in New York. To the contrary, the testimony revealed that defendant, a company incorporated in California, never manufactured any products outside of California. Thus, defendant did not commit a tortious act "within the state" to confer jurisdiction (see CPLR 302[a][2] ; Longines–Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc., 15 N.Y.2d 443, 458–466, 261 N.Y.S.2d 8, 209 N.E.2d 68 [1965], cert denied sub nom. Estwing Mfg. Co. v. Singer, 382 U.S. 905, 86 S.Ct. 241, 15 L.Ed.2d 158 [1965] ; SOS Capital v. Recycling Paper Partners of PA, LLC, 220 A.D.3d 25, 196 N.Y.S.3d 382 [1st Dept. 2023] ).

Furthermore, there is insufficient evidence of defendant's requisite minimal contacts with New York to comport with due process in the exercise of personal jurisdiction over it (see Williams v. Beemiller, Inc., 33 N.Y.3d 523, 528, 106 N.Y.S.3d 237, 130 N.E.3d 833 [2019] ; Carpino v. National Store Fixtures Inc., 275 A.D.2d 580, 582, 712 N.Y.S.2d 684 [3d Dept. 2000] ).


Summaries of

Redell-Witte v. Algoma Hardwoods, Inc.

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 28, 2023
222 A.D.3d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

Redell-Witte v. Algoma Hardwoods, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Holly Redell-Witte, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Algoma Hardwoods, Inc., et…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 28, 2023

Citations

222 A.D.3d 603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
202 N.Y.S.3d 316
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 6826