From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redding v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 10, 2020
17 CIVIL 7075 (CS)(JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2020)

Opinion

17 CIVIL 7075 (CS)(JCM)

02-10-2020

RALPH REDDING, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memo Endorsed Order dated February 10, 2020, no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been received, and no party has asked for an extension of time to object. Accordingly, the R&R was reviewed for plain error. Finding none, the R&R is adopted as the decision of the Court. The Petition is dismissed. Because reasonable jurists would not find it debatable that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. Judgment is entered for Defendant; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

February 10, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Redding v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 10, 2020
17 CIVIL 7075 (CS)(JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Redding v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:RALPH REDDING, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 10, 2020

Citations

17 CIVIL 7075 (CS)(JCM) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2020)

Citing Cases

Licausi v. Griffin

Id. Courts examine the "last reasoned decision" by the state courts in determining whether a federal claim…

Laufer v. Annucci

Hawkins, 460 F.3d at 245. A state evidentiary rule is considered “unconstitutionally arbitrary or…