Summary
explaining that "[a]n inferior court's refusal or failure to timely dispose of a pending action is the ill a writ of procedendo is designed to remedy"
Summary of this case from State ex rel Neguse v. CrawfordOpinion
1994.
explaining that "[a]n inferior court's refusal or failure to timely dispose of a pending action is the ill a writ of procedendo is designed to remedy"
Summary of this case from State ex rel Neguse v. Crawford1994.
explaining that "[a]n inferior court's refusal or failure to timely dispose of a pending action is the ill a writ of procedendo is designed to remedy"
Summary of this case from State ex rel Neguse v. CrawfordFull title:RECONSIDERATION DOCKET
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
The Supreme Court of Ohio has expressly held that "an appeal divests trial courts of jurisdiction to consider…
Tessler v. AyerIn the first set of consolidated appeals, Ayer asserted that the trial court erred by (1) failing to modify…