Summary
stating that to support the inference that the owner possessed constructive knowledge, evidence of how long the hazard existed must be presented
Summary of this case from Ashbaugh v. Family Dollar StoresOpinion
1995.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Reconsideration Docket
Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1995
74 Ohio St. 3d 1422 (Ohio 1995)
Summaries of
Reconsideration Docket
Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1995
74 Ohio St. 3d 1422 (Ohio 1995)
stating that to support the inference that the owner possessed constructive knowledge, evidence of how long the hazard existed must be presented
Summary of this case from Ashbaugh v. Family Dollar StoresCase details for
Reconsideration Docket
Case Details
Full title:RECONSIDERATION DOCKET
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
Citations
74 Ohio St. 3d 1422 (Ohio 1995)
Citing Cases
State v. Clark
Further, plain error is only found in exceptional circumstances to prevent a miscarriage of justice. State v.…
In re PlechatyThis decision, which was appealed to the Eighth District Court of Appeals, was affirmed. See National City…