Summary
holding Ohio wiretapping statute encompasses cordless telephones within statutory language similar to Connecticut's definition of wire communication
Summary of this case from State v. McLoughlinOpinion
1995.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Reconsideration Docket
Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1995
71 Ohio St. 3d 1467 (Ohio 1995)
Summaries of
Reconsideration Docket
Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1995
71 Ohio St. 3d 1467 (Ohio 1995)
holding Ohio wiretapping statute encompasses cordless telephones within statutory language similar to Connecticut's definition of wire communication
Summary of this case from State v. McLoughlinCase details for
Reconsideration Docket
Case Details
Full title:RECONSIDERATION DOCKET
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
Citations
71 Ohio St. 3d 1467 (Ohio 1995)
Citing Cases
Arnold v. Arnold
Although the competency of individuals who are ten years old or older is presumed, the competency of those…
State v. SaidDavid H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, Randy D. Ashburn and John B. Heasley, Assistant Public Defenders,…