From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reames v. State

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jan 6, 2022
37 N.Y.3d 1152 (N.Y. 2022)

Opinion

No. 20 SSM 26

01-06-2022

Dorothy REAMES, as Executrix of H. Carlton Reames, Deceased, Appellant, v. STATE of New York et al., Respondents.

Mackenzie Hughes LLP, Syracuse (W. Bradley Hunt of counsel), for appellant. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Jonathan D. Hitsous, Barbara D. Underwood, Andrea Oser and Julie M. Sheridan of counsel), for respondents.


Mackenzie Hughes LLP, Syracuse (W. Bradley Hunt of counsel), for appellant.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Jonathan D. Hitsous, Barbara D. Underwood, Andrea Oser and Julie M. Sheridan of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division applied the correct substantial factor test (see e.g. Brown v. State of New York, 31 N.Y.3d 514, 519–520, 80 N.Y.S.3d 665, 105 N.E.3d 1246 [2018] ), and record evidence supports the Court of Claims' affirmed finding that defendants' negligence was not a substantial factor in aggravating decedent's injuries or causing his death.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Cannataro concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Reames v. State

Court of Appeals of New York.
Jan 6, 2022
37 N.Y.3d 1152 (N.Y. 2022)
Case details for

Reames v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dorothy REAMES, as Executrix of H. Carlton Reames, Deceased, Appellant, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

37 N.Y.3d 1152 (N.Y. 2022)
159 N.Y.S.3d 755
180 N.E.3d 1055

Citing Cases

Davis v. State

Claimant appeals, and we affirm. Contrary to claimant's contention, we conclude that the court's…

Davis v. State

Contrary to claimant's contention, we conclude that the court's determination is supported by a fair…