From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reamer v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 29, 2022
No. 21-2432 (4th Cir. Dec. 29, 2022)

Opinion

21-2432

12-29-2022

TERRY K. REAMER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Melvin Kabik; TERRY K. REAMER, as Trustee of the Melvin Kabik Revocable Trust, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant, v. INTELLIGENT INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS; SANTANA NOTTAGE, Third Party Defendants.

Jonathan A. Azrael, AZRAEL, FRANZ, SCHWAB, LIPOWITZ &SOLTER, LLC, Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. Matthew B. Malamud, HORST KREKSTEIN &RUNYON LLC, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: November 21, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-02987-CCB)

ON BRIEF:

Jonathan A. Azrael, AZRAEL, FRANZ, SCHWAB, LIPOWITZ &SOLTER, LLC, Towson, Maryland, for Appellant.

Matthew B. Malamud, HORST KREKSTEIN &RUNYON LLC, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Terry K. Reamer, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Melvin Kabik and as Trustee of the Melvin Kabik Revocable Trust, brought an action against State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company ("State Auto") alleging breach of contract.[*] She appeals from the district court's orders granting State Auto's motion to dismiss her complaint and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the arguments presented by the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reamer v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co., No. 1:20-cv-02987-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 23, 2021; Dec. 20, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

[*] Reamer also alleged negligence and conversion by Bank of America National Association. She does not contest on appeal the district court's entry of judgment on the pleadings in favor of Bank of America.


Summaries of

Reamer v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 29, 2022
No. 21-2432 (4th Cir. Dec. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Reamer v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:TERRY K. REAMER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Melvin Kabik…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 29, 2022

Citations

No. 21-2432 (4th Cir. Dec. 29, 2022)

Citing Cases

Abbella Grp. Healthtech v. Qualivis, LLC

Reamer v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co., 556 F.Supp.3d 544, 549 (D. Md. 2021), aff'd, No. 21-2432, 2022 WL…

Shields v. Verizon Md.

A document is ‘integral to the complaint if its very existence, and not the mere information it contains,…