From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

REA v. HORTON

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

March, 1934.


Order as resettled reversed on the law and motion denied, without costs and without prejudice to a new application when the case is properly on the calendar. The court was without authority to grant a preference until the case was properly on the calendar. ( Zimmerman v. Rahmeyer, 230 App. Div. 719.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

REA v. HORTON

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

REA v. HORTON

Case Details

Full title:NANCY REA, Respondent, v. MARGARET HORTON, Appellant. SALVATORE REA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Vinal v. New York Central Railroad Company, Inc.

No note of issue has been filed. A preference will not be granted unless an action is noticed properly to be…

Lee v. Arnowitz

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars…