From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RBC Bank (Usa) v. Epps

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION
Jan 2, 2013
Civil Action No.: 4:11-cv-00124-RBH (D.S.C. Jan. 2, 2013)

Summary

awarding treble damages pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 39-5-140 where "[b]y virtue of the entry of default, the allegations of the Plaintiff's well-pleaded Complaint are deemed admitted, including the allegations that the Defendants' violations were willful."

Summary of this case from Sonoco Prods. Co. v. Güven

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 4:11-cv-00124-RBH

01-02-2013

RBC BANK (USA), Plaintiff, v. THOMAS DARIN EPPS, DUNES MORTGAGE LLC, SYNERGY INVESTMENT GROUP LLC, JEREMY EASON, JJE ENTERPRISES LLC a/k/a J&J ENTERPRISES, MALIA MCCAFFREY, PRODIGY CONSULTING, LLC, LINDA L. STEELE, LINBRANDT, LLC, JOSEPH GRAY, JACQUELINE GRAY, WEST COAST FUNDING, LLC, THERESA FESCHUK, MAJ, LLC, ZAG, LLC, ALISSA SMITH, EAST COAST FUNDING, LLC, CASA MIA, INC. a/k/a/ CASA MIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC, J&M MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. a/k/a/ CHALLENGE HOME EQUITY, MIKE WIMBERLY, ZEREKO NEVADA, INC., YOUVAL GERINGER, STONEGATE PROPERTIES, INC., JOHN M. WARNER, JR., WARFIN DEVELOPERS, LLC, THERON FLOYD, TRINITY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, LARRY PROSSER, DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT, INC., JOHN MARKS, ACTION BUILDERS OF MYRTLE BEACH, LLC, DAVID L. BRIDGES, JR., ALVIN H. SHUMAN, MCKEAN PROPERTIES, LLC, DAVID THOMAS HIX, JR., MYRTLE BEACH VILLAS, LLC, DAVID O'CONNELL, JEFFERY TODD SHOUP, ATLANTIS VILLAS OF NMB, LLC, MATTHEW SKINNER, and BILLY JAMES BARFIELD, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court, pursuant to Rule 55(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 55.01, on the Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Dunes Mortgage LLC, Jeremy Eason, Thomas Darin Epps, Malia McCaffrey, Zereko Nevada Inc., Casa Mia Inc., East Coast Funding LLC, Theresa Feschuk, JJE Enterprises LLC, Linbrandt LLC, MAJ LLC, Prodigy Consulting LLC, Alissa Smith, Linda L. Steele, Synergy Investment Group LLC, West Coast Funding LLC, ZAG LLC, Billy James Barfield, Youval Geringer, David Thomas Hix, Jr., Myrtle Beach Villas LLC, and Mike Wimberly.

All other captioned defendants either answered and were voluntarily dismissed from the action, or were never served within 120 days pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and thus dismissed by the Court.

The Court finds there is no need for an evidentiary hearing and that a decision is properly reached on the basis of the uncontested pleadings and detailed affidavits submitted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) ("The Court may conduct hearings . . . when, to enter or effectuate judgment, it needs to: (A) conduct an accounting; (B) determine the amount of damages; (c) establish the truth of any allegation by evidence; or (D) investigate any other matter."); Anderson v. Found. for Advancement, Educ. and Emp't of Am. Indians, 155 F.3d 500, 507 (4th Cir. 1998) ("[I]n some circumstances a district court entering a default judgment may award damages ascertainable from the pleadings without holding a hearing."). "If the defendant does not contest the amount pleaded in the complaint and the claim is for a sum that is certain or easily computable, the judgment can be entered for that amount without further hearing." JTH Tax, Inc. v. Smith, No. 2:06-cv-76, 2006 WL 1982762, at *2 (E.D. Va. June 23, 2006).

The Court finds that the above named Defendants were properly served and that default was properly entered against them pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By virtue of the entry of default, the allegations of the Plaintiff's well-pleaded Complaint are deemed admitted, including the allegations that the Defendants' violations were willful.

The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's submissions. The Court finds the admitted allegations of the well-pleaded Complaint, the Affidavit of Hayley Webster, the Affidavit of David Dreifus, and the other pleadings and matters contained in the Court's file provide a reasonable basis upon which to rest an award of damages that is easily computable. Therefore, the Court finds that the Plaintiff is entitled to have and recover of these defaulting defendants, jointly and severally, damages in the principal amount of $10,487,828.46. Furthermore, pursuant to both 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c) and S.C. Code Ann. § 39-5-140, the Court finds that the Plaintiff is further entitled to recover treble damages, totaling $31,463,485.38.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is GRANTED, and Judgment be entered in favor of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff shall have and recover from Defendants Dunes Mortgage LLC, Jeremy Eason, Thomas Darin Epps, Malia McCaffrey, Zereko Nevada Inc., Casa Mia Inc., East Coast Funding LLC, Theresa Feschuk, JJE Enterprises LLC, Linbrandt LLC, MAJ LLC, Prodigy Consulting LLC, Alissa Smith, Linda L. Steele, Synergy Investment Group LLC, West Coast Funding LLC, ZAG LLC, Billy James Barfield, Youval Geringer, David Thomas Hix, Jr., Myrtle Beach Villas LLC, and Mike Wimberly, jointly and severally, the principal amount of $31,463,485.38.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

R. Bryan Harwell

United States District Judge
January 2, 2013
Florence, South Carolina


Summaries of

RBC Bank (Usa) v. Epps

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION
Jan 2, 2013
Civil Action No.: 4:11-cv-00124-RBH (D.S.C. Jan. 2, 2013)

awarding treble damages pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 39-5-140 where "[b]y virtue of the entry of default, the allegations of the Plaintiff's well-pleaded Complaint are deemed admitted, including the allegations that the Defendants' violations were willful."

Summary of this case from Sonoco Prods. Co. v. Güven
Case details for

RBC Bank (Usa) v. Epps

Case Details

Full title:RBC BANK (USA), Plaintiff, v. THOMAS DARIN EPPS, DUNES MORTGAGE LLC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 2, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No.: 4:11-cv-00124-RBH (D.S.C. Jan. 2, 2013)

Citing Cases

Sonoco Prods. Co. v. Güven

As stated above, the Court accepts Sonoco's well-pleaded allegations as true, including its allegation that…