From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raynor v. Raynor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 19, 1951
279 App. Div. 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

November 19, 1951.


Defendant, by order to show cause based on his affidavit executed in Florida, moved for a reduction in the amount of alimony payable plaintiff under a final decree of divorce. The affidavit was not authenticated as required by section 359 of the Civil Practice Act. After defendant's motion was granted, he applied for an order authorizing the authentication of said affidavit nunc pro tunc as of the date the order to show cause was issued, and the motion was granted. The appeal is from the order entered thereon. Order affirmed, without costs. The court had jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter, on the motion for a reduction of alimony ( Fox v. Fox, 263 N.Y. 68; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1170), and the lack of an authenticating certificate was a defect or irregularity which could be corrected nunc pro tunc. (Cf. Kelly v. Schramm, 197 App. Div. 377; Lawton v. Kiel, 51 Barb. 30; Civ. Prac. Act, § 105.) Nolan, P.J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Raynor v. Raynor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 19, 1951
279 App. Div. 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Raynor v. Raynor

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY E. RAYNOR, Appellant, v. CLIFTON E. RAYNOR, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Sparaco v. Sparaco

Under these circumstances, we hold that Supreme Court, finding no prejudice to defendant, did not err by…

Raytsin v. Discover Bank

The summons and complaint in the instant case were purportedly served upon defendant in Ohio. However, the…