From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raynor v. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1927
137 S.E. 137 (N.C. 1927)

Opinion

(Filed 16 March, 1927.)

Appeal and Error — Division as to Opinion — Judgments.

Where the Justices of the Supreme Court are equally divided in their opinions on appeal, the judgment of the Superior Court will be affirmed.

APPEAL by defendant from Devin, J., at September Term, 1926, of SAMPSON.

H. E. Faison, R. D. Johnson and Faircloth Fisher for plaintiffs.

Butler Herring and Brooks, Parker, Smith Hayes for defendant.


CONNOR, J., not sitting.


Civil action to recover disability benefits under a policy of insurance issued by the defendant to plaintiffs.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of the feme plaintiff, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.


The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Connor, J., not sitting, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed and stands, according to the uniform practice of appellate courts, as the decision in this case, but without becoming a precedent. Jenkins v. Lumber Co., 187 N.C. 864.

No error.


Summaries of

Raynor v. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1927
137 S.E. 137 (N.C. 1927)
Case details for

Raynor v. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID M. RAYNOR ET UX. v. JEFFERSON STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1927

Citations

137 S.E. 137 (N.C. 1927)
137 S.E. 137

Citing Cases

SEAY v. INSURANCE CO

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is…

Alonzo v. Claverie

The judgment of the Superior Court is therefore affirmed without becoming a precedent. Raynor v. Ins. Co.,…