From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rayford v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Mar 4, 2004
CR 96-428 (Ark. Mar. 4, 2004)

Opinion

CR 96-428

March 4, 2004.


Pro Se Petition to Reinvest Jurisdiction in the Trial Court to Consider a Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis denied.


Summaries of

Rayford v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Mar 4, 2004
CR 96-428 (Ark. Mar. 4, 2004)
Case details for

Rayford v. State

Case Details

Full title:Rayford v. State

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 4, 2004

Citations

CR 96-428 (Ark. Mar. 4, 2004)

Citing Cases

Rayford v. State

Rayford v. State, 2018 Ark. 183, 546 S.W.3d 475; Rayford v. State, 2011 Ark. 86; Rayford v. State, CR-96-428…

Rayford v. State

He argued that the evidence established a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), in that the…