From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Sep 19, 1911
6 Okla. Crim. 637 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)

Opinion

No. A-652.

Opinion Filed September 19, 1911.

Appeal from Jackson County Court; W.J. McConnell, Judge.

Dave Ray was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals. Affirmed.

Johnson, Merrill Reigal, for plaintiff in error.

Chas. West, Atty. Gen., E.G. Spilman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error was tried and convicted in the county court of Jackson county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and on the 15th day of November, 1909, was sentenced to pay a fine of five hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of six months. We have carefully examined the record and briefs of both parties in this cause, and find no error sufficient to entile the plaintiff in error to a new trial. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.


Summaries of

Ray v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Sep 19, 1911
6 Okla. Crim. 637 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)
Case details for

Ray v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVE RAY v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 19, 1911

Citations

6 Okla. Crim. 637 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)
117 P. 1133

Citing Cases

State v. Vining

136 A.L.R. 948 (1942); 52A C.J.S. Larceny § 53 (1968); 2 R. Anderson, Wharton's Criminal Law and Procedure §…

State v. Mermis

See RCW 9A.56.010(18)(c).See Vining, 2 Wn. App. at 809; State v. Ray, 62 Wn. 582, 114 P. 439 (1911); State v.…