From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Reed

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
May 14, 2012
680 F.3d 841 (3d Cir. 2012)

Summary

reinstating the court's prior order requiring simultaneous recoupment, where a prisoner owed multiple filing fees and sought to limit his monthly obligations to a single 20–percent payment

Summary of this case from Siluk v. Merwin

Opinion

Nos. 10–4593 10–4619.

2012-05-14

Frederick T. RAY, III, Appellant, v. Walter REED, Major; Warden John Masters; D. Edward McFadden; Ramon Rustin; Captain Donald Dougherty; Robert Wilson; Morgan Taylor; Phillip Walker; Sgt. Scott Graham; O. Miller, Lt.; Bohn, Lt.; Brooks, Sergeant; Ms. Lawson, Cpl. Frederick T. Ray, III, Appellant, v. Thomas A. Madonna, Sgt.; McCarthy, Cpl.; Yancik, Cpl.; Zepp, Sgt.; Captain Ford, Co.; Police Officer Soto, Co.; R. Wilson, Capt.; Walker, Capt.; Serge, Lt.; Boyd, Guard, Cpl.; Duane, Counselor; Police Officer Forbes, Lt.; Ramon Rustin, Deputy Warden.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Nos. 04–805 & 04–810), District Judge: Honorable John P. Fullam. Ezra D. Rosenberg, Esq., Dechert, Princeton, NJ, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Thomas C. Abrahamsen, Esq., West Chester, PA, Thomas L. Whiteman, Esq., Office of County Solicitor, West Chester, PA, for Defendant–Appellee.


On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Nos. 04–805 & 04–810), District Judge: Honorable John P. Fullam.
Ezra D. Rosenberg, Esq., Dechert, Princeton, NJ, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Thomas C. Abrahamsen, Esq., West Chester, PA, Thomas L. Whiteman, Esq., Office of County Solicitor, West Chester, PA, for Defendant–Appellee.
Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, Circuit Judge and O'CONNOR, Associate Justice (Ret.).

Hon. Sandra Day O'Connor, Associate Justice (Ret.) of the Supreme Court of the United States, sitting by designation.

JUDGMENT ORDER


THEODORE A. McKEE, Chief Judge.

These consolidated cases were heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Eastern of Pennsylvania and were argued on April 19, 2012.

We note that the attorneys and students representing Appellant appeared pro bono. We thank them for taking these cases on a pro bono basis and for the very able and professional way in which they handled the representation and argument before the Court.

AND NOW in consideration of oral argument and briefs that were submitted, it is hereby ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the judgments of the District Court entered November 9, 2010, are hereby affirmed and, with the exception of the denial of the motion to consolidate, the Order issued by the Clerk of this Court on February 25, 2011, is hereby reinstated. Each Party to Pay Own Costs.


Summaries of

Ray v. Reed

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
May 14, 2012
680 F.3d 841 (3d Cir. 2012)

reinstating the court's prior order requiring simultaneous recoupment, where a prisoner owed multiple filing fees and sought to limit his monthly obligations to a single 20–percent payment

Summary of this case from Siluk v. Merwin
Case details for

Ray v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:Frederick T. RAY, III, Appellant, v. Walter REED, Major; Warden John…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Date published: May 14, 2012

Citations

680 F.3d 841 (3d Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Siluk v. Merwin

The government argues that we have tacitly accepted the majority view of our sister courts of appeals, which…