From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Cal. Dep't of Soc. Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2020
Case No. CV 17-04239 PA (SKx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-04239 PA (SKx)

10-27-2020

TRINA RAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, et al., Defendants


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's October 27, 2020, order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant the County of Los Angeles (the "County") and against plaintiffs Trina Ray and Sasha Walker ("Plaintiffs"), it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that:

1. The County shall have judgment in its favor against Plaintiffs; and

2. The County is entitled to its costs of suit pursuant to Local Rule 54.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 27, 2020

/s/_________

Percy Anderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ray v. Cal. Dep't of Soc. Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2020
Case No. CV 17-04239 PA (SKx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Ray v. Cal. Dep't of Soc. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:TRINA RAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 27, 2020

Citations

Case No. CV 17-04239 PA (SKx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2020)

Citing Cases

Peel v. Palco Inc.

Palco's maintenance of some employment records, however, does not alone establish joint employment. See Ray…