From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rawls v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 27, 1993
436 S.E.2d 527 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

A93A2102.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1993.

Drug violation. Cherokee Superior Court. Before Judge Roach.

Dwight L. Thomas, for appellant.

Garry T. Moss, District Attorney, Gregory A. Hicks, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


On June 26, 1992, an indictment was returned against appellant, Frederick Rawls, charging him with trafficking in cocaine. Pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 ( 91 SC 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162) (1970), Rawls pled guilty to the lesser included offense of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, a violation of OCGA § 16-13-30 (b). Under OCGA § 16-13-30, the penalty for that offense consists of various terms of imprisonment, but no monetary fines. The trial court, however, sentenced Rawls to 20 years' imprisonment and ordered him to pay a fine of $100,000, a penalty fee pursuant to OCGA § 15-21-73 of $50, a jail fee of $10,000, and a D.A.T.E. fee of $50,000. On appeal, Rawls argues that the trial court improperly imposed fines, in the absence of statutory authority or a probated sentence. The State concedes this issue, and we agree.

As noted above, the statutory penalty for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute does not include a monetary fine. OCGA § 17-10-8 allows for the imposition of a fine as a condition of probation, but "[w]here the trial court does not award probation, the imposition of a fine in addition to a prison sentence is outside the trial court's discretion...." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Wood v. State, 204 Ga. App. 467, 469 ( 419 S.E.2d 534) (1992) (also involving a conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute). Additionally, the imposition of a penalty pursuant to OCGA § 15-21-73 can only attach to properly imposed fines. See OCGA § 15-21-73 (a) (1). And finally, imposition of a D.A.T.E. fee also requires a lawfully imposed fine. OCGA § 15-21-100 (a). Accordingly, those portions of Rawls' sentence imposing the $100,000 fine, the $50 penalty, and the $50,000 D.A.T.E. fee are vacated.

Judgment vacated in part. McMurray, P. J., and Johnson, J., concur.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1993.


Summaries of

Rawls v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 27, 1993
436 S.E.2d 527 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Rawls v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAWLS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 27, 1993

Citations

436 S.E.2d 527 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)
436 S.E.2d 527

Citing Cases

Marshall v. State

See Lester v. State, 190 Ga. App. 59, 61 ( 378 SE2d 364) (1989). Compare Rawls v. State, 210 Ga. App. 408,…

In Interest of A. T

Because the juvenile court thus was not authorized to impose a fine upon A. T. for possessing cocaine, the…