From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rattner v. Kleiman

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Apr 6, 1932
48 S.W.2d 439 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932)

Opinion

No. 8802.

April 6, 1932.

Error from District Court, Cameron County; A. M. Kent, Judge.

Action between Morris Rattner and Rebecca Kleiman and husband. From a judgment for Rebecca Kleiman and husband, Morris Rattner brings error.

Affirmed.

See, also, 36 S.W.2d 249.

Galbraith Goodrich, of Brownsville, for plaintiff in error.

John C. Myrick, of Harlingen, for defendants in error.


The record and statement of facts only were filed in this case, and neither party filed briefs.

We have examined the record for fundamental error, but find none that should cause a reversal; hence, in the absence of briefs of either party, we find it our duty to affirm the judgment of the court, which we do.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Rattner v. Kleiman

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Apr 6, 1932
48 S.W.2d 439 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932)
Case details for

Rattner v. Kleiman

Case Details

Full title:RATTNER v. KLEIMAN et al

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio

Date published: Apr 6, 1932

Citations

48 S.W.2d 439 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932)