In Rashid v. Cancel, 9 Misc 3d 130(A), the court found that the use of an illegal basement for residential purposes brought an entire building under the rubric of rent stabilization because the basement's residential use constituted the sixth residential unit in the building.
Summary of this case from Feldheim v. StuckeySeptember 30, 2005.
Landlord and Tenant — Rent Regulation.
In Rashid v. Cancel, 9 Misc 3d 130(A), the court found that the use of an illegal basement for residential purposes brought an entire building under the rubric of rent stabilization because the basement's residential use constituted the sixth residential unit in the building.
Summary of this case from Feldheim v. StuckeyIn Rashid v. Cancel, 9 Misc.3d 130(A), 808 N.Y.S.2d 920, the court found that the use of an illegal basement for residential purposes brought an entire building under the rubric of rent stabilization because the basement's residential use constituted the sixth residential unit in the building.
Summary of this case from Feldheim v. StuckeyFull title:RASHID v. CANCEL
Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York
Date published: Sep 30, 2005
The main question before the court is: whether the underlying facts show that there was ever a sixth unit in…
Joe Lebnan, LLC v. OlivaAt a nonjury trial of this proceeding, tenant produced seven witnesses, who testified as to the existence of…