From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rashad v. Ferguson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 3, 2013
No. 1:13CV00003 KGB-HDY (E.D. Ark. Apr. 3, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:13CV00003 KGB-HDY

04-03-2013

FAHIM JAMAL RASHAD PLAINTIFF v. JOHN FERGUSON, DONALD VAULNER, JANE DOES ONE AND TWO, and MRS. DOBBS DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has received findings and a recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 20). After a careful review of the findings and recommendation, the timely objections received thereto, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The motion for preliminary injunction filed by plaintiff Fahim Jamal Rashad is denied (Dkt. No. 19).

____________________

Kristine G. Baker

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rashad v. Ferguson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 3, 2013
No. 1:13CV00003 KGB-HDY (E.D. Ark. Apr. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Rashad v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:FAHIM JAMAL RASHAD PLAINTIFF v. JOHN FERGUSON, DONALD VAULNER, JANE DOES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 3, 2013

Citations

No. 1:13CV00003 KGB-HDY (E.D. Ark. Apr. 3, 2013)