From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rani v. Ahmad

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jul 1, 2020
185 A.D.3d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2019–09604 Index No. O–5659–18

07-01-2020

In the Matter of Salma RANI, appellant, v. Awais AHMAD, respondent.

Allan D. Shafter, Port Washington, NY, for appellant.


Allan D. Shafter, Port Washington, NY, for appellant.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Lauren Norton–Lerner, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated June 12, 2018. The order, after a hearing, inter alia, in effect, denied the family offense petition and dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, alleging that the respondent had committed various family offenses against her. After a hearing, the Family Court, inter alia, in effect, denied the family offense petition and dismissed the proceeding. The petitioner appeals.

In a family offense proceeding, the petitioner has the burden of establishing, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that the charged conduct was committed as alleged in the petition (see Family Ct Act § 832 ). "The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the Family Court, and its determinations regarding the credibility of witnesses are entitled to great weight on appeal, such that they will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record" ( Matter of Porter v. Moore, 149 A.D.3d 1082, 1083, 53 N.Y.S.3d 174 ). Here, we agree with the Family Court's determination, after a hearing, that the petitioner failed to establish, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that the respondent committed a family offense. Accordingly, we agree with the court's determination, in effect, denying the family offense petition.

MASTRO, J.P., COHEN, DUFFY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rani v. Ahmad

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jul 1, 2020
185 A.D.3d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Rani v. Ahmad

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Salma Rani, appellant, v. Awais Ahmad, respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jul 1, 2020

Citations

185 A.D.3d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 3666
124 N.Y.S.3d 833

Citing Cases

Stallings v. Stallings

"The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the Family…