From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randolph v. Pinecrest Retirement Comm.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Nov 3, 2015
NO. 9:15-cv-39 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 9:15-cv-39

11-03-2015

ARLICE J. RANDOLPH v. PINECREST RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES


ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This case is referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial matters. Pending before the court is Defendant Pinecrest Retirement Communities' "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint." (Doc. No. 8.) On September 19, 2015, the magistrate judge filed his report (Doc. No. 14), recommending that this court deny the Defendant's motion. The Defendant filed timely objections to the report and recommendation. (Doc. No. 17.)

After conducting a de novo review of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and the Defendant's objections, the court finds that the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions are correct. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Defendant's objections (Doc. No. 17) are OVERRULED; the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. No. 14) is ADOPTED; and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is DENIED.

SIGNED this 3rd day of November, 2015.

/s/_________

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Randolph v. Pinecrest Retirement Comm.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Nov 3, 2015
NO. 9:15-cv-39 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Randolph v. Pinecrest Retirement Comm.

Case Details

Full title:ARLICE J. RANDOLPH v. PINECREST RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 3, 2015

Citations

NO. 9:15-cv-39 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2015)

Citing Cases

Medina v. Parkside Lending LLC

Therefore, considering [plaintiff's] pro se status, and taking her allegations in her complaint and response…

Bardell v. Jefferson Par. Sch. Bd.

At the motion-to-dismiss stage, it is sufficient that Plaintiff has alleged that he has filed EEOC charges…