From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Randall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 30, 1977
352 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 77-851.

November 30, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pasco County, Ray E. Ulmer, Jr., J.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, David S. Bergdoll, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, and Charles M. Johnston, Research Asst., Gainesville, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1) Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Randall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 30, 1977
352 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Randall v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT L. RANDALL, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 30, 1977

Citations

352 So. 2d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Boshears v. State

There was error, however, in the court's failure to specify appellant's jail-time credit in the sentence.…