Opinion
June 8, 2000.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on or about December 7, 1999, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a trip and fall over a step stool in an office corridor, denied defendant premises occupant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Jeffrey J. Shapiro, for plaintiff-respondent.
Laurel A. Wedinger, for defendant-appellant.
Before: Tom, J.P., Wallach, Rubin, Saxe, Buckley, JJ.
Plaintiff's submissions raise an issue of fact as to whether the corridor in which she fell was dangerously cluttered with cardboard file boxes and step stools left there by file clerks. In addition, the affidavit of plaintiff's co-worker that he complained about the condition of the corridor, including the step stools, to defendant's personnel at least two or three times before plaintiff's accident, raises an issue of fact as to whether defendant had actual or, at least, constructive notice of the alleged danger (see, O'Connor-Miele v. Barhite Holzinger, 234 A.D.2d 106). Defendant's argument that the affidavit of this co-worker may not be considered because his existence was not revealed until after the case was put on the trial calendar is unsupported by a showing of prejudice or of willful disobedience of disclosure obligations (see, Cruz v. New York City Hous. Auth., 192 A.D.2d 322; compare, Vigio v. New York Hosp., 264 A.D.2d 668), and we therefore reject the contention.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.