From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rana v. Thomas

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 11, 2008
983 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3D06-2673.

June 11, 2008.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Victoria S. Sigler, Judge.

David M. Goldstein and Ergio I. Fernandez, for appellants.

Hinshaw Culbertson and James H. Wyman (Ft. Lauderdale); Morgan, Olsen Olsen and Brian D. Gottlieb, (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellees.

Before COPE, WELLS and LAGOA, JJ.


Affirmed. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.150 (providing that the trial court may strike sham pleadings); Cromer v. Mullally, 861 So.2d 523, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (stating that a pleading is considered a sham "when it is inherently false and clearly known to be false at the time the pleading was made"); Ader v. Temple Ner Tamid, 339 So.2d 268, 270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (stating that to be stricken as a sham under Rule 1.150, a pleading must appear "clearly false, as a mere pretense, set up in bad faith, and without color of fact").


Summaries of

Rana v. Thomas

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 11, 2008
983 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Rana v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:Krishan RANA and Joseph Cataldo, as assignee of the interest of Frank J…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 11, 2008

Citations

983 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)