From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramseur v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 24, 2008
283 F. App'x 998 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-2135.

Submitted: July 22, 2008.

Decided: July 24, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. William Connelly, Magistrate Judge. (8:06-cv-02995-WGC).

Joann Jeffries Ramseur, Appellant Pro Se. James A. Frederick, Goodell, Devries, Leech Dann, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Joann Jeffries Ramseur appeals the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, the United States of America, and dismissing her claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671- 2680 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ramseur v. United States, No. 8:06-cv-02995-WGC (D.Md. Oct. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Ramseur v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 24, 2008
283 F. App'x 998 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Ramseur v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Joann Jeffries RAMSEUR, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 24, 2008

Citations

283 F. App'x 998 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Rite Aid of Md., Inc.

Rite Aid points out that Ms. Ahaghotu's testimony, as to her personal opinion about duty, does not bind Rite…

Frostbutter v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc.

Just as possessors of land owe a duty of reasonable care to invitees, they are entitled to presume invitees…