From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 1, 1997
697 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-1673

Opinion filed August 1, 1997.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Roger J. McDonald, Judge.

Guillermo Ramos, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Guillermo Ramos appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Ramos claims he is entitled to an additional 31 days of credit for time served in jail before sentencing. The trial court correctly held that the proper vehicle for seeking additional jail time credit, when the sentence imposed does not exceed the statutory maximum, is Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Brown v. State, 689 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Chaney v. State, 678 So.2d 880 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). However, the trial court also held that Ramos' claim was refuted by the attached record. Our review of the record indicates that he may, in fact, be entitled to the additional credit. Therefore, we affirm the trial court's order, without prejudice to Ramos to file a timely Rule 3.850 motion.

AFFIRMED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DAUKSCH and GOSHORN JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ramos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 1, 1997
697 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Ramos v. State

Case Details

Full title:GUILLERMO RAMOS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 1, 1997

Citations

697 So. 2d 231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Vanderblomen v. State

The Fifth District Court of Appeal, citing Davis, Callaway andSullivan, then also held that a claim for…

Williams v. State

After he violated probation, the court imposed a new prison sentence, and the issue he raised in his motion…