From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
Aug 28, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-109 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-109

08-28-2020

BENITA RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Benita Ramos seeks review of the Administrative Law Judge's decision to deny her disability insurance benefits. (Complaint, Doc. 1) She moves for summary judgment. (Motion, Doc. 7)

On July 29, 2020, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) concluding that substantial evidence did not support the ALJ's decision and recommending that the case be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further hearings. No party filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. As a result, it is:

ORDERED that Plaintiff Benita Ramos' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 7) is GRANTED; and

ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further hearings not inconsistent with this Order and the adopted Report and Recommendation.

All other relief not expressly granted is denied.

SIGNED this 28th day of August, 2020.

/s/_________

Fernando Rodriguez, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ramos v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
Aug 28, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-109 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Ramos v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:BENITA RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 28, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-109 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2020)

Citing Cases

Garcia v. Kijakazi

Social security cases supporting remand demonstrate instances in which the ALJ discounts all of the…

Baker v. Saul

While "the Fifth Circuit has not addressed the precise issue," several federal appellate courts "have held…