From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Lucio

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division
Sep 24, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. B-08-122 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 24, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. B-08-122.

September 24, 2008


OPINION ORDER


BE IT REMEMBERED that on September 24, 2008, the Court considered the Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Agreed Motion and Memorandum in Support of Extension of Time Before Deadline to Designate and Produce Report. Dkt. No. 44.

In the instant motion, the parties request a 37-day extension of time to produce their expert reports. Id. If granted, a 37-day extension would require a modification of the Court's Scheduling Order regarding the dates scheduled for the completion of mediation and the completion of discovery. See Dkt. No. 34. Amendment of a court's scheduling order is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. "Both Rule 16 and the Reform Act clearly establish that district judges are under an obligation to manage civil cases to ensure, in part, their speedy resolution." Chiropractic Alliance of N.J. v. Parisi, 164 F.R.D. 618, 621 (D.N.J. 1996). Under Rule 16, "[a] schedule shall not be modified except upon a showing of good cause and by leave of the district judge." FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b).

Based on the parties' representations, the Court finds that the parties have acted diligently to complete discovery and designate experts for this case. If an extension of time to file the expert reports were not granted at this time, the parties would be forced to litigate this matter without adequate preparation. Furthermore, the requested extension will not disturb the dates scheduled for trial. Therefore, the Court determines that there is good cause for granting the requested extension of time.

Based on the foregoing, the Court GRANTS the Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Agreed Motion and Memorandum in Support of Extension of Time Before Deadline to Designate and Produce Report. Dkt. No. 44. The case is therefore RE-SET as follows:

The plaintiffs' experts, if any, will be named with a report furnished by: October 17, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. The defendants' experts, if any, will be named with a report furnished by: November 17, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. Depositions of expert witnesses must be completed by: December 5, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. Parties to mediate case by: December 15, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. DONE at Brownsville, Texas.


Summaries of

Ramos v. Lucio

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division
Sep 24, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. B-08-122 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 24, 2008)
Case details for

Ramos v. Lucio

Case Details

Full title:ROSA MONTES RAMOS, individually, and as the Administratrix of the Estate…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division

Date published: Sep 24, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. B-08-122 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 24, 2008)

Citing Cases

Harris Cnty. v. Coats

Federal district courts within the circuit are in accord, including, as relevant, in excessive force suits.…

Gipson v. Harris Cnty.

In Miller, the district court dismissed claims against the Harris County Constable's Office, Precinct Seven,…