From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramos v. Fisher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Oct 14, 2014
Civil No. 13-cv-1059 (ADM/HB) (D. Minn. Oct. 14, 2014)

Opinion

Civil No. 13-cv-1059 (ADM/HB)

10-14-2014

Mark Ramos, Petitioner, v. Scott Fisher, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;



2. Petitioner Mark Ramos's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; and



3. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: October 14, 2014

s/Ann D. Montgomery

ANN D. MONTGOMERY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ramos v. Fisher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Oct 14, 2014
Civil No. 13-cv-1059 (ADM/HB) (D. Minn. Oct. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Ramos v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:Mark Ramos, Petitioner, v. Scott Fisher, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Oct 14, 2014

Citations

Civil No. 13-cv-1059 (ADM/HB) (D. Minn. Oct. 14, 2014)

Citing Cases

Jacobs v. Barnes

Accordingly, the Court concludes that any involvement by Secretary Nichols in the UDCs did not violate due…

Goich v. Birkholz

(Wilson Decl., Ex. A at 45); see also 28 C.F.R. § 541.3, Table 1. "The BOP's interpretation of its own…