From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Sears Roebuck and Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 17, 2003
864 So. 2d 62 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 3D03-1233.

Opinion filed December 17, 2003.

An appeal from the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Lower Tribunal No. 03-2846.

Keith M. Stern, for appellant.

John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellee Commission.

Before COPE, LEVY and FLETCHER, JJ.


Ramon Ramirez appeals an order denying unemployment compensation benefits. As we view the matter, the violation of the work rule in this case was attributable at least in part to a breach of procedure by another Sears Roebuck and Company employee who failed to place a warning cone behind the customer's vehicle when it was taken into the service bay, and on a supervisor's decision to reassign the mechanic responsible for the tire rotation, before the mechanic had completed his work. While it may be true that the claimant Ramirez should have noticed the tire rotation work on the invoice and checked to make sure it was complete, this amounts at best to an isolated incident of negligence which does not rise to the level of disqualifying misconduct under the unemployment compensation statute. See Philemy v. Florida Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Servs., 731 So.2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Easton v. State Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 693 So.2d 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Bulkan v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 648 So.2d 846 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). Accordingly we reverse the order under review and remand with directions to grant the unemployment benefits.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Sears Roebuck and Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 17, 2003
864 So. 2d 62 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Sears Roebuck and Company

Case Details

Full title:RAMON E. RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY and FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 17, 2003

Citations

864 So. 2d 62 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)