From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Raptor Tech. Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION
Jul 3, 2012
Case No.: 5:12-cv-100-Oc-34TBS (M.D. Fla. Jul. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 5:12-cv-100-Oc-34TBS

07-03-2012

VIVIANA RAMIREZ, on her own behalf and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. RAPTOR TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., a Florida Profit Corporation and THOMAS P. GLEASON, individually, Defendants.


ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 19; Report), entered on June 8, 2012. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Smith recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Final Default Judgment (Dkt. No. 11) be granted, and that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and severally. See Report at 10. Plaintiff has no objections to the Report and requests that the Court enter an Order granting Plaintiff's Motion for Final Default Judgment. See Notice of Non Objection to Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 20).

The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). If no specific objections to findings of facts are filed, the district court is not required to conduct a de novo review of those findings. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the district court must review legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); United States v. Rice, No. 2:07-mc-8-FtM-29SPC, 2007 WL 1428615, at * 1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2007).

Upon independent review of the file and for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report, the Court will accept and adopt the legal and factual conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 19) of Magistrate Judge Smith is ADOPTED by the Court.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Final Default Judgment (Dkt. No. 11) is GRANTED.

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and severally, for the following amounts:

a. $8,168.00 in damages ($5,800.00 for the FLSA claim plus $1,900.00 for the breach of contract claim plus $468.00 in taxable costs), plus,
b. Post-judgment interest, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, to accrue at the rate provided for in Section 1961 from the date of entry of final judgment by the Clerk to the date of payment.

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, this 3rd day of July, 2012.

_______________________

MARCIA MORALES HOWARD

United States District Judge

ja

Copies to:

The Honorable Thomas B. Smith

United States Magistrate Judge

Counsel of Record

Thomas P. Gleason

as Registered Agent for Raptor Technology Group, Inc.

and Individually

7064 Sampey Road

Groveland, FL 34736


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Raptor Tech. Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION
Jul 3, 2012
Case No.: 5:12-cv-100-Oc-34TBS (M.D. Fla. Jul. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Raptor Tech. Grp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VIVIANA RAMIREZ, on her own behalf and others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION

Date published: Jul 3, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 5:12-cv-100-Oc-34TBS (M.D. Fla. Jul. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Popoca v. Simpson Envtl. Servs.

Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that the Court dismiss the collective action allegations. Ramirez v.…

Feliciano v. Styrofoam Moulding Co.

Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that the Court dismiss the collective action allegations. Ramirez v.…