From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado. EN BANC
Sep 17, 2001
43 P.3d 611 (Colo. 2001)

Opinion

No. 99SC814.

September 17, 2001.

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Case No. 97CA1792.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION

No. 99SC814, Ramirez v. People .

By operation of law, the decision of the court of appeals, 997 P.2d 1200 (Colo.App. 1999), is affirmed by an equally divided court. See C.A.R. 35(e).

David S. Kaplan, Colorado State Public Defender, Elizabeth Griffin, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for the Petitioner.

Ken Salazar, Attorney General, Jerry N. Jones, Special Assistant Attorney General, Appellate Division, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for the Respondent.


JUSTICE COATS does not participate.

Justice Kourlis, Justice Hobbs and Justice Rice are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals, 997 P.2d 1200 (Colo.App. 1999), should be affirmed; whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Martinez, and Justice Bender are of the opinion that it should be reversed. Justice Coats does not participate.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 35(e).


Summaries of

Ramirez v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado. EN BANC
Sep 17, 2001
43 P.3d 611 (Colo. 2001)
Case details for

Ramirez v. People

Case Details

Full title:Micaela Ramirez, Petitioner, v. The People of the State of Colorado…

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. EN BANC

Date published: Sep 17, 2001

Citations

43 P.3d 611 (Colo. 2001)

Citing Cases

People v. Trusty

Defendant had in his pocket fifty to one hundred rocks of crack cocaine, with a street value of at least…

People v. Martinez

Accordingly, the amount of cocaine constituted a sentence enhancing circumstance and did not form part of the…