From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ramirez v. Francisco

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 9, 2023
1:23-cv-00162-JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 9, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00162-JLT-HBK (PC)

05-09-2023

ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COPIES (DOC. NO. 9)

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff s construed motion for copies.(Doc. No. 9). Plaintiff s request for copies should be directed to the clerk's office. Plaintiff is advised that his pro se status does not entitle him to receive complimentary copies. Blair v. CDCR, 2018 WL 1959532, at *6 n.2 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2018). Consistent with statute, the clerk provides copies of documents and the docket sheet at $0.50 per page. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914. Checks in the exact amount are payable to “Clerk, USDC.”

Plaintiff titles his request for relief as an “Affidavit.” A request for a court order requesting any relief must be made by motion. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(b).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Plaintiff s motion for copies is DENIED. (Doc. No. 9).


Summaries of

Ramirez v. Francisco

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 9, 2023
1:23-cv-00162-JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Ramirez v. Francisco

Case Details

Full title:ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 9, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00162-JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 9, 2023)